You may be asked to write reflectively for an assignment. There are many models of reflection. This handout provides basic generic guidance for reflective writing, and it is therefore vital that you follow any guidelines you may have been given to meet your course requirements.
It is looking back at past experience to perform better in the future.
It analyses, explores and explains what happened and why, and usually involves incorporating models and/or theory. For this, you should use academic language.
It considers strengths, weaknesses, anxieties and errors. You can use personal language, such as “I” and “We”, when talking about observations, emotions and feelings.
It is constructively criticising yourself, the event and often others.
It requires evidence to support what you are saying. This includes things said or done, and their causes and effects. Therefore, it requires clear records of events and your thoughts.
Think about what was done. Analyse the event by thinking in depth from different perspectives. Use subject theory, reflective models and personal insight. The critical evaluation you make of your and others’ actions should be applied to future events.
Think about what happened, what did and didn’t work and what you think about it.
Critically evaluate what you would do differently in the future and explain why.
The expression of reflection may be free and unstructured, in the sense that it might, on some courses, be in the form of a personal diary, learning journal or a narrative for design development. Nonetheless, tutors normally expect to see carefully-structured writing.
Reflection usually has the following four major components:
Introduction: the event, incident or topic.
Description and problematisation of the event.
Cause and effect of the critical event. Do not write too much description at this stage.
Explain and critique what happened, what are you trying to resolve here, what you have learnt and how you would move forwards.
The following example of basic reflective writing can be broken down into three parts: description, interpretation and outcome. First, the full example is provided. Next, it is broken down and divided into the three parts.
“Specific tasks were shared out amongst members of my team. However, the tasks were not seen as equally difficult by all team members. Consequently, the perception of unfairness impacted on our interactions. Social interdependence theory recognises a type of group
interaction called “positive interdependence” (Johnson & Johnson, 2008, cited by Maughan & Webb, 2010) and many studies demonstrate that learning can be improved through cooperation (Maughan & Webb, 2010). We did not experience these with the initial task allocation.
Nonetheless, we achieved a successful outcome through further negotiation. Therefore, we found that “cooperative learning experiences encourage higher achievement.” (Maughan & Webb, 2010). To improve the process in future, perhaps we could elect a chairperson to help encourage cooperation when tasks are being allocated.
Descriptions tend to be short. They explain what happened and what is being examined.
“Specific tasks were shared out amongst members of my team. However, the tasks were not seen as equally difficult by all team members.”
Intrepretation could include what is most important, interesting, useful or relevant about the object, event or idea. It could include how it can be explained, for example with theory.
Consequently, the perception of unfairness impacted on our interactions. Social interdependence theory recognises a type of group interaction called “positive interdependence” (Johnson & Johnson, 2008, cited by Maughan & Webb, 2010) and many studies demonstrate that learning can be improved through cooperation (Maughan & Webb, 2010). We did not experience these with the initial task allocation.
This should cover what you have learnt from the experience and what it means for your future.
Nonetheless, we achieved a successful outcome through further negotiation. Therefore, we found that “cooperative learning experiences encourage higher achievement.” (Maughan & Webb, 2010). To improve the process in future, perhaps we could elect a chairperson to help encourage cooperation when tasks are being allocated.
Here are some words and phrases to help you with description, interpretation and outcome.
We are not suggesting specific vocabulary for description, because the range of possible events, ideas or objects on which you might reflect is so great. Nonetheless, when describing an idea, a theory or a model it is usually best to use the present tense: for example, “Social interdependence theory recognises that …”.
When personalising your statements, you could begin with, for example, “For me, …”, “I found”, “I felt” or “I believe”. Please note that you need to give your reasoning and/or evidence.
Meaningful; significant; important; relevant; useful.
Aspect; element; experiences; issues; ideas.
Previously; at the time; at first; initially; subsequently; consequently; later.
Some words and phrases used to express your personal viewpoint, behaviour or action: Thought; did not think; felt; did not feel; noticed; did not notice; questioned; did not question; realised; did not realise; did something; did not do something; expected; did not expect.
Alternatively; equally; this is similar to; is unlike; differs from.
This might be; is perhaps; could be; is probably; may be seen as; suggests; indicates.
“because”; “due to”; “explains”; “may be explained by”; “is related to”.
Having read; experienced; applied; discussed; analysed; learnt.
I now feel; think; realise; wonder; question; know; believe.
Additionally; furthermore; most importantly; I have improved; I have slightly developed.
My skills; understanding; knowledge of; ability to.
This knowledge; understanding; skill. Is; could be; will be. Essential; important; useful. As a learner because. As a practitioner because.
Because: I did not; have not yet; am not yet certain about; am not yet confident about; do not yet know; do not yet understand.
I will now need to; in a future similar situation, I would; I need to further develop my knowledge; my skills; my understanding; my responses would be different.
Johnson, D., and Johnson, F. (2008). Joining together: group theory and group skills. New York: Pearson.
Maughan, C., and Webb, J. (2010). Small group learning and teaching. Retrieved from http://78.158.56.101/archive/law/resources/teaching-and-learning-practices/groups/index.html.
If you would like an ASK tutorial, please contact us.
Email: academicskills@port.ac.uk.
Phone: 02392 843462.
Visit: Third Floor, Nuffield Building.
Resource revised 2019.